Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training

Native American college students in counseling: Results from a large-scale, multisite effectiveness study.
There is a large body of research exploring therapeutic effectiveness for racially or ethnically minoritized college students. Prior literature highlights the unique mental health and academic challenges faced by Native American students in higher education; however, there is a paucity of research examining the effectiveness of counseling for Native American college students. The present study examined the effectiveness of counseling on psychological and academic distress among Native American college students, comparing their initial distress and rate of change to White students in counseling. Using naturalistic data from a large practice–research network spanning 2015–2019, we employed hierarchical linear modeling to evaluate the effect of race on psychological distress (N = 9,621) and academic distress (N = 9,643) scores during treatment. Results revealed that all clients demonstrated a significant decrease in both types of distress over the course of treatment. Native American and White clients presented to counseling with similar levels of psychological distress. However, Native American clients experienced more change and at a faster rate on psychological distress symptoms compared to White clients. On academic distress, Native American clients began and concluded counseling with higher levels of distress while experiencing a similar amount of change at a similar rate in their reduction of academic distress over the course of treatment. The study findings provide unique insight on the outcomes of treatment-seeking Native students by demonstrating a significant positive response to counseling, as well as novel comparisons between Native and White students receiving services within college counseling settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Preventing dropout in spiritually integrated psychotherapies: What are the effective methods of attending to clients’ spirituality?
The purpose of this study was to examine associations between clinicians’ use of varying types of spiritual interventions in the first session of spiritually integrated psychotherapies (SIPs) and clients’ likelihood of returning for a second session. In total, 154 practitioners of SIPs from 33 settings in a practice-research network reported on their implementation of different methods for addressing clients’ religion/spirituality on an after-session summary checklist. Roughly 80% or more of the clinicians implemented at least one spiritual intervention in the first session; on average, clinicians used 3.26 (SD = 3.66) of the interventions on the checklist. Occurring with 20% or more of the 1,094 clients, the most commonly used spiritual interventions included listening to spiritual issues, discussing compassion and hope, affirming clients’ divine worth and attempts to trust God. In total, nearly one in five clients did not return for a second session. Focusing on interventions that were empirically linked with clients’ engagement in a second session in bivariate analyses, discussion of spiritual dimensions of clients’ problems and solutions was associated with a 118% greater probability that clients engaged in SIPs; in contrast, discussion of hope was linked with a 40% decrease in treatment engagement. In conclusion, findings highlight the potential opportunities and risks for implementing interventions that attend to clients’ spirituality and/or religious faith at the start of SIPs. Research is needed to understand factors associated with the effective use of spiritual interventions and methods of training clinicians accordingly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Sexual Orientation Microaggression Rating Scale (SOMRS): Development and association with alliance ruptures.
Sexual minority clients report experiencing frequent microaggressions during therapy, however, therapists may not recognize those microaggressions or may be reluctant to self-report them. The main aim of the present study was thus to develop an observational measure of in-session therapist-committed microaggressions related to the sexual orientation of sexual minority individuals (e.g., those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer). The present study further examined the association between therapist-committed sexual orientation microaggressions and ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. We hypothesized that clinically significant microaggressions would be positively associated with withdrawal ruptures in the alliance. The sample consisted of 44 gay and bisexual men who participated in a cognitive behavioral treatment designed to reduce depression, anxiety, human immunodeficiency virus-transmission-risk behaviors, and substance use. An observer-based coding measure designed for this study, the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Rating Scale (SOMRS), was utilized to capture sexual minority microaggressions in the initial sessions of treatment. Good interrater reliability was achieved for the SOMRS. Microaggressions were coded in 34% of the sessions. Within the subset of sessions with coded microaggressions, a significant association was found between withdrawal ruptures and microaggression significance ratings. The SOMRS holds potential for supporting research on microaggression as well as future efforts to help clinicians recognize and repair in-session behaviors that negatively impact sexual minority clients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
The relationship between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy: A three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis.
Psychotherapy is an interpersonal process of collaboration toward specified treatment goals. The therapeutic alliance is well established as an important factor of psychotherapeutic change. However, the experience of distress in social interactions, commonly referred to as interpersonal problems, might be interfering with the collaborative process during psychotherapy. This study systematically reviews the literature and obtains an estimate of the relationship between pretreatment interpersonal problems and the quality of the therapeutic alliance. Overall, 27 studies with 48 correlation coefficients were included in the final analysis. Due to the nested structure of the data, a three-level meta-analytic approach with a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied. Alliance assessment phase, alliance rater, alliance measure instrument, and treatment type were tested as potential moderators. Heterogeneity and publication bias test were performed. The meta-analysis showed a small, but significant negative relationship between interpersonal problems at the beginning of psychotherapy and subsequent therapeutic alliance (r = −.12, SE = .02, 95% CI [−.16, −.08], p< .001, d = −.27). Only alliance assessment phase accounted for significant variability. There were no indications for a substantial publication bias. Interpersonal problems of patients before psychotherapy are a robust predictor for lower therapeutic alliance quality, albeit a small effect size. Consequently, patients who experience interpersonal problems may face greater challenges in developing a strong alliance with their therapists, especially in early stages of the treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
State and trait characteristics of attachment as predictors of outcome in inpatient psychotherapy.
Attachment has mostly been investigated as a stable characteristic of individuals, although theoretical considerations and recent empirical findings suggest that attachment styles are also subject to change. When attachment is investigated as a treatment factor in psychotherapy, state and trait characteristics need to be differentiated, as they warrant different conclusions. This study examined the trait- and statelike characteristics of attachment styles over the course of inpatient psychotherapy as predictors of treatment outcome. A total of N = 419 patients provided weekly measurements of attachment styles and symptoms for up to 8 weeks of inpatient psychotherapy. Data were analyzed in multilevel longitudinal models controlling for rolling admissions and weekly changes in group membership. Over the course of treatment, patients’ attachment styles became more secure and less fearful-avoidant. Trait attachment security as well as gains in attachment security predicted better outcomes, while trait preoccupied and fearful-avoidant attachment as well as increases in attachment preoccupation and anxiety predicted worse outcomes. Findings imply that attachment security may grow during a relatively short inpatient treatment period and both trait attachment styles as well as changes in attachment styles predict outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Should we feel the same? Mutual recognition and congruence between therapist and client regarding ruptures and repairs.
The pattern of rupture and repair within therapeutic alliances has been associated with improved outcome. The present study adds to this body of research by examining rupture and repair from a dyadic perspective. First, we examined the relationship between mutual recognition of ruptures, rupture intensity, and client ratings of session helpfulness. We then examined client–therapist congruence regarding rupture and repair characteristics and their relation to client ratings of session helpfulness. Data were collected from 90 client–therapist dyads (providing two subsamples of 61 and 45 dyads) during 16 sessions of short-term psychodynamic therapy. Clients and therapists rated the occurrence of ruptures, rupture characteristics, and rupture repair following each session. Clients also rated session helpfulness following each session. We found a significant negative interaction effect, indicating that when clients rated ruptures as more intense, therapist rupture recognition was related to lower client ratings of session helpfulness. Client–therapist congruence in the perception of rupture intensity was positively related to client perceptions of the extent to which ruptures were discussed. Finally, we found a significant positive relationship between client–therapist congruence in their perception of rupture repair and client ratings of session helpfulness. This study demonstrates the significance of the dyadic view of the rupture/repair process. Therapist recognition of ruptures may not be enough to facilitate repair, specifically in ruptures with a high level of intensity. Nevertheless, congruence in intensity is valuable for addressing the rupture within the session, and congruence in repair is valuable for session helpfulness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Pathological narcissism’s impact on psychodynamic group therapy for perfectionism.
Several decades of theory suggest that pathological narcissism (PN) may limit psychotherapy success, but empirical evidence for such theories is limited and mixed. In addition, it has been proposed that individuals with high levels of PN may benefit more from supportive compared to interpretive psychodynamic therapies, but no studies thus far have investigated this question empirically. As such, our study aimed to extend past research by investigating (a) whether higher levels of pretreatment PN predict poorer treatment outcome and (b) whether the type of psychodynamic therapy (supportive or interpretive therapy) moderates these findings, in a sample of patients undergoing group psychodynamic psychotherapy for perfectionism. The sample was drawn from the University of British Columbia Perfectionism Treatment Study II (Hewitt et al., 2023) and consisted of 80 treatment-seeking adults with elevated perfectionism. Contrary to expectations, multilevel and multiple regression analyses showed that pretreatment PN did not significantly predict posttreatment changes in symptom severity, life satisfaction, or work and social impairment. We also did not find that either grandiose or vulnerable narcissism predicted likelihood of patient dropout. Finally, treatment type did not moderate the relationship between pretreatment PN and treatment outcome, suggesting that, contrary to our hypotheses, PN does not impact treatment outcome regardless of the interpretive nature of the psychodynamic group therapy. These results, taken together with past findings, suggest that PN may not be associated with poorer psychotherapy outcomes in certain contexts, such as in the case of supportive or interpretive psychodynamic group psychotherapy for perfectionism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Psychotherapist factors that patients perceive are associated with treatment failure.
Psychotherapy is a well-established and effective treatment for various psychiatric problems, but a substantial proportion of patients do not benefit from it, and many terminate treatment prematurely. Previous studies suggest that therapist dissatisfaction may play a pivotal role in premature treatment termination. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate therapist factors that may contribute to less-than-optimal results and dropout. Data were collected through a survey of patients (n = 736) with the experience of previous unsuccessful psychotherapy treatments. Based on prior research, the survey covered 13 therapist behaviors and traits, such as being unstructured or unengaged. The most common therapist factor that patients associated with treatment failure was poor assessment/understanding (86.7%), followed by inflexibility (71.7%) and poor knowledge (70.1%). Furthermore, this study identified four novel therapist-related factors: breaking the treatment contract, inappropriate sexual behaviors or comments, using non-conventional methods, and dominating behaviors. Overall, this study highlights the significance of therapist-related factors in premature treatment termination and treatment failure, shedding light on the crucial role therapists play in the therapeutic process. Understanding these factors is essential for improving psychotherapy outcomes and reducing dropout rates. Further investigations are needed to explore the impact of these therapist behaviors on treatment outcomes and to develop strategies for enhancing therapist competencies and skills to foster a more effective therapeutic alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Should psychotherapists conduct visual assessments of nonsuicidal self-injury wounds?
Beneficence and nonmaleficence are key ethical principles toward which psychotherapists consistently strive. When patients engage in nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) during the course of psychotherapy, therapists may feel responsible for visually assessing the severity of the NSSI wound in order to benefit their patients and keep them from harm. However, there are no guidelines for conducting these visual assessments, and there is no research exploring their effects on patients. This article considers the ethical implications of visually examining NSSI wounds; discusses psychotherapist scope of practice and competence; draws attention to relevant ethical standards; underscores risk management, liability, and standard of care; and addresses the risk of suicide or accidental death resulting from NSSI. It also provides ethical guidance for conducting effective verbal assessments of NSSI wounds and offers suggestions for navigating complex clinical situations, such as when patients routinely and spontaneously show their therapists their wounds and how psychotherapists should handle assessments and interventions related to NSSI scars. It ends with implications for training and therapeutic practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Psychotherapy - Vol 61, Iss 3